orders.create(cart)Two orders for one cart.
Bring the diff, the discussion, and the decision into the same view.
Open the reviewexport async function checkout(cart: Cart) { const order = await orders.create(cart); await payments.charge(order.total); return order;} const key = `cart:${cart.id}:${cart.version}`; const order = await orders.create(cart, { key }); await payments.charge(order.total, { key }); return order;export async function checkout(cart: Cart) { const key = `cart:${cart.id}:${cart.version}`; const order = await orders.create(cart, { key }); await payments.charge(order.total, { key }); return order;}export function readSession(token: Token) { return cache.get(token.subject);} if (token.expiresAt <= Date.now()) return null; return cache.get(token.subject);export function readSession(token: Token) { if (token.expiresAt <= Date.now()) return null; return cache.get(token.subject);}export function search(query: string) { return products.find(query);} const term = query.trim(); if (!term) return []; return products.find(term);export function search(query: string) { const term = query.trim(); if (!term) return []; return products.find(term);}Inspect the suggested change, then apply it to this local example.
Replay the edge case behind the review: one checkout request arrives twice.
orders.create(cart)Two orders for one cart.
orders.create(cart, { key })The retry returns the original order.
Nora attached one question to the order creation step. The reason lives beside the diff, where the next person can understand it.
orders.create(cart)A retry can create a second order.
The same key follows the order and the charge. Inspect the exact lines before accepting the suggestion.
const key = `cart:${cart.id}:${cart.version}`;Both operations share one idempotency key.
The sample check repeats an identical request, then compares the returned order identifiers. It explains the condition being checked.
expect(first.id).toBe(retry.id)Sample check: one order from two requests.
The final record keeps the changed lines, the reason, and the reviewer together. A future reader does not need to reconstruct the conversation.
decision: "Keep retries idempotent"The review is ready for a human decision.
An illustrative review sequence. Sample checks do not execute project code.
A checkout fix and a release change need different questions. Start with a working agreement, then inspect what it asks of the reviewer.
Sample team policiesThis agreement is a local review preview.
Three decisions in this sample review.
Change the filter to continue the review.
src/payments/checkout.ts:43
A slow connection can replay this request. Use the same idempotency key for the order and the charge, so a retry returns the original result.
const key = `cart:${cart.id}:${cart.version}`;src/auth/session.ts:19
The cache can remain warm after a token expires. Check the token clock before returning cached user data.
if (token.expiresAt <= Date.now()) return null;src/catalog/search.ts:28
Whitespace-only requests currently scan the entire catalogue. Normalize the phrase and return an empty result before querying.
const term = query.trim();Select a decision to inspect its source line and rationale.
The changed file, the exact source line, the reviewer’s reason, and its resolution. Applying the sample checkout suggestion updates the review sequence and its decision record below.
Yes. Revert restores the original lines for that file. Changes stay associated with their file when you switch between checkout, session, and search examples.
Choose a product, infrastructure, or release context. Each agreement asks for different evidence and a different reviewer. The local preview records your choice alongside the final review stage.
No. This is an editable frontend template. The diff, retry replay, and checks use illustrative local state. Connect your own repository and check runner before offering those services.
Try the edge case. Inspect the suggestion. Make the decision.